<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Karen Joy Properties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://karenjoyproperties.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://karenjoyproperties.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 18:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Housing survey report</title>
		<link>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2012/05/housing-survey-report/</link>
		<comments>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2012/05/housing-survey-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 18:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karen Joy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http://campbellsurveys.com/reagent1203/HousingTrendsUpdate_Apr_2012.pdf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenjoyproperties.com/?p=222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click on the link to see how the market trends look for March 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click on the link to see how the market trends look for March 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2012/05/housing-survey-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Housing Pulse</title>
		<link>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2012/05/housing-pulse/</link>
		<comments>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2012/05/housing-pulse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 19:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karen Joy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http://campbellsurveys.com/reagent1203/HousingTrendsUpdate_Apr_2012.pdf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenjoyproperties.com/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click here for a four page newletter snapshop of trends in the market for April 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click here for a four page newletter snapshop of trends in the market for April 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2012/05/housing-pulse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>http://www.car.org/media/pdf/consumer/Beyond_the_Headlines__1312.pdf</title>
		<link>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2012/03/httpwww-car-orgmediapdfconsumerbeyond_the_headlines__1312-pdf/</link>
		<comments>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2012/03/httpwww-car-orgmediapdfconsumerbeyond_the_headlines__1312-pdf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karen Joy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenjoyproperties.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of good information comes to Realtors from California Association of Realtors, here is a newsletter specifically designed for our consumers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of good information comes to Realtors from California Association of Realtors, here is a newsletter specifically designed for our consumers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2012/03/httpwww-car-orgmediapdfconsumerbeyond_the_headlines__1312-pdf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check this news link out&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2012/02/check-this-news-link-out/</link>
		<comments>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2012/02/check-this-news-link-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karen Joy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenjoyproperties.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.dsnews.com/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.dsnews.com/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2012/02/check-this-news-link-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Property sales tax in 2013 with Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/12/207/</link>
		<comments>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/12/207/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karen Joy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenjoyproperties.com/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Association of REALTORS is all over this and working to get it repealed, before it takes effect. But, I am very pleased we aren&#8217;t the only ones who know about this ploy to steal billions from unsuspecting homeowners. How many REALTORS do you think will vote Democratic in 2012? Did you know that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
 The National  Association of REALTORS is all over this and working to get  it repealed, before it takes effect. But, I am very pleased  we aren&#8217;t the only ones who know about this ploy to steal  billions from unsuspecting homeowners. How many REALTORS do  you think will vote Democratic in 2012?  </p>
<p>  Did you know that if  you sell your house after 2012 you will pay a 3.8% sales tax  on it? That&#8217;s $3,800 on a $100,000 home, etc. When did this  happen? It&#8217;s in the health care bill and goes into effect in  2013. </p>
<p>  Why 2013? Could it be  to come to light AFTER the 2012 elections? So, this is  &#8220;change you can believe in&#8221;? Under the new health care bill  all real estate transactions will be subject to a 3.8% Sales  Tax. </p>
<p>  If you sell a  $400,000 home, there will be a $15,200 tax.<br />
 This bill is set to  screw the retiring generation who often downsize their  homes. Does this make your November and 2012 vote more  important? </p>
<p>  Oh, you weren&#8217;t aware  this was in the Obamacare bill? Guess what, you aren&#8217;t  alone. There are more than a few members of Congress that  aren&#8217;t aware of it either  <http://www.gop.gov/blog/10/04/08/obamacare-flatlines-obamacare-taxes-home> http://www.gop.gov/blog/10/04/08/obamacare-flatlines-obamacare-taxes-home  <  <http://www.gop.gov/blog/10/04/08/obamacare-flatlines-obamacare-taxes-home> http://www.gop.gov/blog/10/04/08/obamacare-flatlines-obamacare-taxes-home>  </p>
<p>  I hope you forward  this to every single person in your address book. VOTERS  NEED TO KNOW. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/12/207/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mortgages are taking longer, escrows delayed</title>
		<link>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/10/mortgages-are-taking-longer-escrows-delayed/</link>
		<comments>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/10/mortgages-are-taking-longer-escrows-delayed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karen Joy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenjoyproperties.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am part of a group of Realtors who take a survey every month regarding the Real Estate Profession. Our newest newsletter compiled from the data received about September escrows was pretty amazing. I was not surprised since it was all about the same comments and answers I gave in the survey. It&#8217;s just nice [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am part of a group of Realtors who take a survey every month regarding the Real Estate Profession.  Our newest newsletter compiled from the data received about September escrows was pretty amazing.  I was not surprised since it was all about the same comments and answers I gave in the survey.  It&#8217;s just nice to know the problem is not mine but everyones. </p>
<p>The big &#8220;news&#8221; this month is that what used to take lenders 30 days to do, now is almost double that time.  Some of the reasons (excuses) the lenders give is that there are a lot of re-fis in the pipeline due to the very low interest rates.  That doesn&#8217;t seem right to me as I know most people are under water with their properties and lenders are not eager to refi a property that appraises for less than the loan amount owed on the property&#8230;(there is a new program that the President has <strong>said</strong> will help millions of underwater homeowners reduce their payments through refinance) I wonder what kind of incentive the President plans to give to the already overly bailed out banks to refi an overencumbered property with better terms.  The Banks I&#8217;ve been dealing with, (the big 4) aren&#8217;t doing anyone any favors.</p>
<p>The survey suggests telling buyers up front to expect delays in the loan process.  Also remind your buyers to make their payments on time while in the escrow process and don&#8217;t go out and buy some big ticket item before you close escrow or do anything that will appear as a change on your credit report.  The lenders (IMHO) are just looking for excuses to not give you the loan.</p>
<p>My horror story last month was B of A refused to loan on a property they own (an REO), first they require that you use them and after 60 days, they decline the loan because they don&#8217;t like the HOA docs (which by the way have not changed).  </p>
<p>On another property (also B of A REO) they declined to lend because of the leased land&#8230;</p>
<p>I was told that both BofA and Wells Fargo would be participating in the new HARP program outlined this last week by the President&#8230;I&#8217;m looking forward to that, I just wonder how that will work, be sure I will be talking about it here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/10/mortgages-are-taking-longer-escrows-delayed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PSBN meeting with City Manager</title>
		<link>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/10/psbn-meeting-with-city-manager/</link>
		<comments>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/10/psbn-meeting-with-city-manager/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karen Joy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenjoyproperties.com/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning I was pleasantly surprised by some information I received from our City Manager regarding the financing agreement between John Wessman (owner of the Fashion Plaza) and the City in regards to the proposed measure J to be voted on next month by the Palm Springs voters. According to what I believe I heard; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning I was pleasantly surprised by some information I received from our City Manager regarding the financing agreement between John Wessman (owner of the Fashion Plaza) and the City in regards to the proposed measure J to be voted on next month by the Palm Springs voters.  According to what I believe I heard; if Mr. Wessman does not perform according to the agreement, by doing what he needs to do regarding rebuilding the &#8220;mall&#8221; including demolition and reconstruction, according to a strict timeline, he will have no choice but to hand over the whole project to the city upon his default&#8230;so we don&#8217;t care if he can&#8217;t get financing, (this was one of the important questions at the meeting this morning) since many developers in the past few years have stopped projects because they have lost their funding.</p>
<p>If all this is true, I am happy to vote yes on J&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/10/psbn-meeting-with-city-manager/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I am voting for Proposition J</title>
		<link>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/10/why-i-am-voting-for-proposition-j/</link>
		<comments>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/10/why-i-am-voting-for-proposition-j/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karen Joy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenjoyproperties.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having been a staunch supporter of Palm Springs as THE destination in our desert, I have been troubled for the last 10 years over the deterioration of our downtown mainly due to Mr. Wessmans inactivity of the Desert Fashion Plaza. I have not changed my mind that I feel Mr. Wessman has held this city [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been a staunch supporter of Palm Springs as THE destination in our desert, I have been troubled for the last 10 years over the deterioration of our downtown mainly due to Mr. Wessmans inactivity of the Desert Fashion Plaza.  I have not changed my mind that I feel Mr. Wessman has held this city hostage for the past 6 or 7 years, and I can no longer see a way through this mess downtown without the 1% sales tax designed to actually help the Desert Fashion Plaza.</p>
<p>1% may be &#8220;small change&#8221; as the political signs say&#8230;.. small change over the period of 25 years becomes a big deal.  The voters asked to pass this measure are rightly concerned about how this money will be spent.  The City Council says they will appoint an oversight committee to determine who and what these funds will be used for and in what priority.  Is this committee any way different from the Planning Commission or the Human Rights Commission or the Sustainability Commission?&#8230;I have been present many times when the Council overides the decisions of the commissions they have appointed to do the job.  These commissions work many hours, study things, make field trips, and make decisions only to have them overturned by the council.  This makes it even more important to vote for council members you can actually talk to and have the city&#8217;s best interest at heart.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/10/why-i-am-voting-for-proposition-j/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>January Housing Trends</title>
		<link>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/03/january-housing-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/03/january-housing-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 02:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karen Joy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenjoyproperties.com/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a member of this reporting group and the info compiled is amazing. I hope this is the survey that I just read, I found it very interesting. Real Estate is not going away, but it sure looks different than it did a few years ago. This is the longest housing slump I have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a member of this reporting group and the info compiled is amazing.  I hope this is the survey that I just read, I found it very interesting.  Real Estate is not going away, but it sure looks different than it did a few years ago.  This is the longest housing slump I have seen in my 40+ years in the business.  Our biggest problem is &#8220;JOBS&#8221; without a job, there is no money (unless you have a trust fund).  We need JOBS and we need some certainty, the only thing I&#8217;m certain of is that things constantly change&#8230;</p>
<p>http://campbellsurveys.com/REAgent1101/HousingTrendsUpdate_Feb11.pdf</p>
<p><a href="http://campbellsurveys.com/REAgent1101/HousingTrendsUpdate_Feb11.pdf"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/03/january-housing-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Info that can effect your bottom line&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/01/info-that-can-effect-your-bottom-line/</link>
		<comments>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/01/info-that-can-effect-your-bottom-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karen Joy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenjoyproperties.com/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the main Propositions that affect property taxes? Proposition 13 Established limitations on increases in assessed value and set the maximum general property tax rate at 1 percent Proposition 3 Base Year Value Transfer for Property Taken by Governmental Action Proposition 8 Reduction in Assessed Value Due to a Decline in Value Proposition 58 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li><strong>What are the main Propositions that affect property taxes?</strong></li>
</ol>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="30%" valign="top">Proposition 13</td>
<td width="70%" valign="top">Established limitations on increases in assessed value and set the maximum general property tax rate at 1 percent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Proposition 3</td>
<td valign="top">Base Year Value Transfer for Property Taken by Governmental Action</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Proposition 8</td>
<td valign="top">Reduction in Assessed Value Due to a Decline in Value</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Proposition 58</td>
<td valign="top">Reassessment Exclusion for Real Property Transfers Between Parents and Children</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Propositions 60 and 90</td>
<td valign="top">Senior Citizen&#8217;s Replacement Dwelling Benefit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Proposition 110</td>
<td valign="top">Severely and Permanently Disabled Resident Exclusion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Proposition 193</td>
<td valign="top">Reassessment Exclusion for Real Property Transfers from Grandparents to Grandchildren</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<ol>
<li><strong>What is Proposition 13?</strong></li>
</ol>
<p>Proposition 13, passed in 1978, established the base year value concept for property tax assessments. Under Proposition 13, the 1975-1976 fiscal year serves as the original base year used in determining the assessment for real property. Thereafter, annual increases to the base year value are limited to the inflation rate, as measured by the California Consumer Price Index, or two percent, whichever is less. A new base year value, however, is established whenever a property, or portion thereof, has had a change in ownership or has been newly constructed.</p>
<p>Under Proposition 13, the property tax rate is fixed at one percent of assessed value plus amounts required to repay any assessment bonds approved by the voters.</p>
<p><em>Reference</em>:<a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_13A"> Section 2 of Article XIII A of the California Constitution.</a></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>What is </strong><a href="http://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/faqs/prop3.htm"><strong>Proposition 3</strong></a><strong>? </strong></li>
</ol>
<p>Proposition 3 provides the transfer of a property&#8217;s adjusted base year value to a replacement property when a property has been taken by eminent domain proceedings, acquisition by a public entity, or governmental action resulting in a judgment of inverse condemnation. Specific requirements must be met.</p>
<p><em>Reference</em>: <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_13A">Section 2(d) of Article XIII A of the California Constitution</a> and <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=rtc&amp;codebody=&amp;hits=20">section 68 of the Revenue and Taxation Code</a>.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>What is </strong><a href="http://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/faqs/prop8.htm"><strong>Proposition 8</strong></a><strong>? </strong></li>
</ol>
<p>Proposition 8 requires the county assessor to annually enroll either a property’s adjusted base year value (Proposition 13 value) or its current market value, whichever is less. When the current market value replaces the higher Proposition 13 value on the assessor’s roll, that lower value is commonly referred to as a &#8220;Prop 8&#8243; value.</p>
<p>Although the annual increase for a Prop 13 value is limited to no more than two percent, the same restriction does not apply to values adjusted under Prop 8. The market value of a Prop 8 property is reviewed annually as of January 1; the current market value must be enrolled as long as the Prop 8 value still falls below the Prop 13 value. Thus, any subsequent increase or decrease in market value is enrolled regardless of any percentage increase or decrease. When the current market value of a Prop 8 property exceeds its Prop 13 value (adjusted for inflation), the county assessor reinstates the Prop 13 value.</p>
<p><em>Reference</em>: <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_13A">Section 2(b) of Article XIII A of the California Constitution</a> and <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=rtc&amp;codebody=&amp;hits=20">section 51 of the Revenue and Taxation Code</a>.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>What are </strong><a href="http://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/faqs/propositions58.htm"><strong>Propositions 58 and 193? </strong></a></li>
</ol>
<p>Proposition 58 provides for an exclusion from reassessment real property transfers between parents and children. Proposition 193 expands this tax relief to include certain transfers from grandparents to their grandchildren (transfers <em>from grandchildren to grandparents</em> are not eligible). Specific requirements must be met.</p>
<p><em>Reference</em>: <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_13A">Section 2(h) of Article XIII A of the California Constitution</a> and <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=rtc&amp;codebody=&amp;hits=20">section 63.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code</a>.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>What are</strong><a href="http://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/faqs/propositions60_90.htm"><strong> Propositions 60 and 90?</strong></a></li>
</ol>
<p>Propositions 60 and 90 allow senior citizens to transfer the adjusted base year value from their current home to a replacement dwelling. Certain requirements must be met.</p>
<p>In general, if you or your spouse is age 55 or older, you or your spouse may buy or construct a new home of equal or lesser value than your existing home and transfer the adjusted base year value of your existing home to your new home if certain requirements are met. This is a one-time-only benefit. Thus, once you have filed and received this tax relief, neither you nor your spouse (if your spouse is a record owner of the replacement dwelling) can ever be granted this benefit again. The only exception is if you or your spouse becomes disabled after receiving this tax relief for age. If this happens, you or your spouse may transfer the base year value a second time based upon the disability. The relief for disability involves a different claim form.</p>
<p><em>Reference</em>: <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_13A">Section 2(a) of Article XIII A of the California Constitution</a> and <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=rtc&amp;codebody=&amp;hits=20">section 69.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code</a>.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>What is the difference between Proposition 60 and Proposition 90?</strong></li>
</ol>
<p>Proposition 60 relates to transfers of base year values between properties located within the same county. Proposition 90 relates to transfers of base year values from an original property in one county to a replacement property in another county within California. For a transfer to be eligible under Proposition 90, the county in which the replacement property is located must have adopted an ordinance that allows such transfers. Currently, the following eight counties have passed ordinances authorizing these intercounty transfers:</p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="26%" valign="top">Alameda</td>
<td width="24%" valign="top">Los Angeles</td>
<td width="22%" valign="top">San Diego</td>
<td width="28%" valign="top">Santa Clara</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">El Dorado</td>
<td valign="top">Orange</td>
<td valign="top">San Mateo</td>
<td valign="top">Ventura</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>This list may change at any given time. Please call your county assessor&#8217;s office to check if your county has passed such an ordinance.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>What is </strong><a href="http://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/faqs/propositions110.htm"><strong>Proposition 110?</strong></a></li>
</ol>
<p>Proposition 110 extends the benefits of Propositions 60/90 to qualified disabled homeowners of any age. Other than the age factor, the same requirements under Propositions 60/90 must be met. Effective September 25, 1996, qualified persons who had prior claims based on age may file a second claim based on disability. However, once a person qualifies due to disability, he or she may not receive the base year value transfer benefit due to age.</p>
<p><em>Reference</em>: <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_13A">Section 2(a) of Article XIII A of the California Constitution</a> and <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=rtc&amp;codebody=&amp;hits=20">section 69.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code</a>.</p>
<hr size="2" />SOURCE:  California Board of Equalization <a href="http://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/faqs/caproptaxprop.htm">http://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/faqs/caproptaxprop.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://karenjoyproperties.com/2011/01/info-that-can-effect-your-bottom-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

